The following steps should be used to diagnose problems when running any nonlinear static analysis: Run your model in a linear static solution. Check that the run completed normally and that the results appear correct. Also, check that the Epsilon value is small (.
$begingroup$
A státic linear regression offers the type $yt = mathbfxt'boIdsymboltheta + epsilont$ while á dynamic linear regression has the fórm $yt = mathbfxt'boIdsymbolthetat + epsilont$. Thus, $boldsymboltheta$ will be permitted to differ over time in a dynamic regression while it can be set for all period in static régression.
ln conditions of the generative process, for the státic model, we wouId place a distribution on $boldsymboltheta$ whose parameters are set for all period. We could then generate data by drawing $boldsymboltheta$ from this distribution and after that producing $yt$ provided $mathbfxt$. For the dynamic model, we could spot a distribution on $boldsymbolthetat$ that is dependent only on data up through time $testosterone levels-1$. We could then use this to generate a arbitrary $boldsymbolthetat$ and after that a random $yt$. Therefore, the crucial distinction between the two models will be that the variables of $boIdsymboltheta$ in the státic model are usually set for all time while they can change in the dynamic model.
I feel baffled when it comes to inference, nevertheless. If information were prepared sequentially, what would become the difference between the sequence of parameter quotes that characterize the distribution of $boldsymboltheta$ acquired by repeatedly refitting a státic model and thát acquired by ahead blocking in the powerful model? Put on't both versions depend on the same data, and hence, shouldn't they yield the same parameter quotes? If so, what benefit does the powerful model in fact provide?
Vivék SubramanianVivék Subramanian
92811 gold logo1111 silver badges22
22 bronze badges$endgroup$
Browse other queries tagged regressiontime-series or consult your very own question.